mirror of
https://github.com/imjasonh/chessh
synced 2026-07-08 09:05:43 +00:00
deploy directly to GCE
Signed-off-by: Jason Hall <jason@chainguard.dev>
This commit is contained in:
parent
36c03525a9
commit
c79040c509
16 changed files with 390 additions and 438 deletions
59
docs/cost.md
Normal file
59
docs/cost.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
|
|||
# Cost Analysis: GCE VM + TCP Load Balancer Architecture
|
||||
|
||||
Based on the current GCE VM with TCP Load Balancer architecture, estimated costs:
|
||||
|
||||
## Minimum Monthly Cost (No Traffic)
|
||||
|
||||
**Compute Engine VM:**
|
||||
- 1 × e2-micro instance (1 vCPU, 1GB RAM): ~$6-8/month
|
||||
- Persistent disk (10GB standard): ~$0.40/month
|
||||
|
||||
**TCP Load Balancer:**
|
||||
- Global Network Load Balancer with forwarding rules: ~$18-22/month
|
||||
- Health check service: ~$0.50/month
|
||||
|
||||
**Other Resources (minimal cost):**
|
||||
- DNS zone and records: ~$0.50/month
|
||||
- Secret Manager (2 secrets): ~$0.06/month
|
||||
- Container Registry storage: ~$0.10/month
|
||||
|
||||
**Total estimated minimum cost: ~$25-31/month**
|
||||
|
||||
The TCP Load Balancer remains the largest cost component (~70% of total). However, this architecture is more cost-effective than the previous Cloud Run + GKE setup by eliminating the GKE Autopilot cluster overhead.
|
||||
|
||||
## Usage-Based Costs
|
||||
|
||||
**VM Instance Scaling:**
|
||||
- Base e2-micro handles ~50-100 concurrent SSH sessions efficiently
|
||||
- For higher load, can scale up to larger machine types:
|
||||
- e2-small (2 vCPU, 2GB): ~$12-16/month
|
||||
- e2-medium (2 vCPU, 4GB): ~$24-32/month
|
||||
|
||||
**Per-Connection Costs:**
|
||||
Since the VM runs 24/7, marginal cost per additional SSH connection is minimal until CPU/memory limits are reached.
|
||||
|
||||
**Example Scaling Scenarios:**
|
||||
- 50 concurrent users: Base e2-micro (~$25-31/month total)
|
||||
- 150 concurrent users: e2-small (~$30-38/month total)
|
||||
- 500+ concurrent users: e2-medium + load balancer (~$42-54/month total)
|
||||
|
||||
## Cost Advantages vs Previous Architecture
|
||||
|
||||
**Eliminated Costs:**
|
||||
- GKE Autopilot cluster management fees
|
||||
- Multiple pod overhead
|
||||
- WebSocket proxy layer complexity
|
||||
|
||||
**Simplified Pricing:**
|
||||
- Predictable monthly VM cost regardless of session count
|
||||
- Direct SSH connections without proxy overhead
|
||||
- Single-instance architecture easier to monitor and optimize
|
||||
|
||||
## High-Scale Considerations
|
||||
|
||||
For very high usage (1000+ concurrent users), consider:
|
||||
- Auto-scaling instance groups with multiple VMs
|
||||
- Regional distribution for latency optimization
|
||||
- Cost would scale roughly linearly: ~$50-100 per 1000 concurrent users
|
||||
|
||||
The current architecture provides excellent cost efficiency for small-to-medium scale deployments while maintaining the flexibility to scale up cost-effectively.
|
||||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue