mirror of
https://github.com/imjasonh/nescript
synced 2026-07-08 08:55:38 +00:00
codegen: make var_addrs misses panic loudly and fix latent struct-field silent drop
Phase 1 of the post-PR-#31 audit. The PR #31 state-local bug had a specific shape: analyzer allocated a slot, codegen looked it up by VarId, silently emitted nothing on miss. Six sites in gen_op plus the global-initializer loop and the parameter-shuffle prologue all used the same `if let Some(&addr) = self.var_addrs.get(var) { ... }` pattern with no else branch. Any future allocation-map desync would slip through the same crack. Replace every site with a new `IrCodeGen::var_addr(VarId) -> u16` helper that panics with an explicit "compiler bug" message on miss. An IR op referencing an unmapped VarId is not valid input — it means the analyzer and lowerer disagreed on what to allocate, and we want that crash to surface in CI rather than be absorbed by whatever zero-filled RAM happened to sit at the read. Running cargo test against the hardened lookup surfaced exactly the bug shape the plan predicted: uninitialized struct globals (e.g. `var p: Point` with no literal initializer) never had their flattened field VarIds (`"p.x"`, `"p.y"`) registered in var_addrs. The IR lowerer's `get_or_create_var("p.x")` minted a VarId, the analyzer's `flatten_struct_fields` allocated an address for it, but IrCodeGen::new only populated var_addrs from `ir.globals`, which doesn't contain synthesized field entries for uninitialized structs. Every `p.x = N` silently compiled to nothing. Fix by exposing the IR lowerer's name→VarId map on IrProgram and joining it with the analyzer's allocations in IrCodeGen::new. Every allocated name that the lowerer knows about now gets a var_addrs entry. Example ROMs are byte-identical (no example relied on the dropped writes), but the bug was reachable — any user program with a plain `var pos: Point` declaration and field writes would have hit it silently. Add `uninitialized_struct_field_store_emits_sta_to_allocated_address` as a byte-level regression guard: compile `p.x = 123` and scan PRG for `LDA #\$7B / STA <addr>`. Fails against the old silently-dropping codegen. https://claude.ai/code/session_01AoQ678uVeqpyayvWHpfDhC
This commit is contained in:
parent
431f144be7
commit
f7012c6533
5 changed files with 144 additions and 60 deletions
|
|
@ -335,6 +335,49 @@ fn program_with_u16_struct_field() {
|
|||
rom::validate_ines(&rom_data).expect("should be valid iNES");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn uninitialized_struct_field_store_emits_sta_to_allocated_address() {
|
||||
// Regression guard for the silent-drop bug uncovered while
|
||||
// hardening the `var_addrs` lookup in `IrCodeGen`. Before the
|
||||
// fix, field `VarId`s synthesized by the IR lowerer (e.g.
|
||||
// `"pos.x"`) were only registered in `var_addrs` when their
|
||||
// parent struct global had a literal initializer. An
|
||||
// uninitialized `var pos: Point` produced no field globals, so
|
||||
// `pos.x = 100` emitted `IrOp::StoreVar(VarId(for pos.x), ...)`
|
||||
// — and the codegen's `if let Some(&addr) = var_addrs.get(..)`
|
||||
// guard skipped it, silently dropping the write with no
|
||||
// diagnostic.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// We verify by compiling a program whose entire frame handler
|
||||
// is a write with a distinctive immediate constant, then
|
||||
// search the PRG for the corresponding `LDA #$7B ; STA zp/abs`
|
||||
// pair. `123 = $7B` is chosen because it can't appear as an
|
||||
// incidental constant in the runtime prelude.
|
||||
let source = r#"
|
||||
game "StructStore" { mapper: NROM }
|
||||
struct Point { x: u8, y: u8 }
|
||||
var p: Point
|
||||
on frame {
|
||||
p.x = 123
|
||||
}
|
||||
start Main
|
||||
"#;
|
||||
let rom_data = compile(source);
|
||||
let prg = &rom_data[16..16 + 16384];
|
||||
let mut found = false;
|
||||
for i in 0..prg.len().saturating_sub(3) {
|
||||
if prg[i] == 0xA9 && prg[i + 1] == 0x7B && (prg[i + 2] == 0x85 || prg[i + 2] == 0x8D) {
|
||||
found = true;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
assert!(
|
||||
found,
|
||||
"expected an LDA #$7B / STA <addr> pair for `p.x = 123` — if this \
|
||||
fails, struct-field writes are being silently dropped again"
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn u16_struct_field_initializer_writes_both_bytes_to_rom() {
|
||||
// Struct literal initializer with a u16 field > 255 — the
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue